Cause and Effect diagram Archives - 6sigma https://6sigma.com/tag/cause-and-effect-diagram/ Six Sigma Certification and Training Fri, 28 Feb 2025 13:25:45 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://6sigma.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/cropped-favicon-blue-68x68.png Cause and Effect diagram Archives - 6sigma https://6sigma.com/tag/cause-and-effect-diagram/ 32 32 Six Sigma Information That Bears Repeating https://6sigma.com/six-sigma-information-bears-repeating/ https://6sigma.com/six-sigma-information-bears-repeating/#respond Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:54:29 +0000 https://6sigma.com/?p=21915 Repetition makes reputation and reputation makes customers.” These words were spoken by Florence Nightingale Graham, who founded the cosmetic empire Elizabeth Arden, Inc., So in honor of International Women’s Day this month, we are taking her advice and repeating great Six Sigma information, specifically several quality tools often used in the discipline.

The post Six Sigma Information That Bears Repeating appeared first on 6sigma.

]]>
Repetition makes reputation and reputation makes customers.” These words were spoken by Florence Nightingale Graham, who founded the cosmetic empire Elizabeth Arden, Inc., So in honor of International Women’s Day this month, we are taking her advice and repeating great Six Sigma information, specifically several quality tools often used in the discipline.

Pareto Analysis: This is a technique that helps determine which tasks make the most overall impact. This uses the Pareto Principal, which is also known as the 80/20 rule. It  translates to 20% of the work done generates 80% of the benefit of doing the entire process or job.

Broken down:

  • 20% of your products or services account for 80% of customer complaints
  • 20% of possible causes account for 80% of delays in the schedule
  • 80% of your profits come from 20% of your product or services
  • 80% of your company’s revenue is produced by 20% of your sales staff

Pareto Chart: This is a vertical bar chart that helps you automatically see by the descending order of the height of the bar and how to prioritize the problem. This can help in analyzing issues and identifying root causes.

Flowcharts: These are great and can be used in process mapping. Flow charts give a visual of work processes. Anyone can quickly see how and if there are duplicate efforts being done or what part of the process doesn’t offer value to the end product.

Check Sheets: These are used to collect data and keep an organized list of data.

Histograms: These are to quickly find variation in an existing process. The spikes in the histograms would show the variation. To create a histogram you need to:

  • Collect the data having to do with the issue
  • Prioritize the data
  • Assign categories
  • Create a bar chart
  • Fill in counts and categories

Cause and Effect Diagrams: Also known as the fishbone or Ishikawa Diagram, these are used when a company team is involved in problem solving.  Brainstorming is a big component used for filling in the possible causes and effects. The cause and effect diagrams can be used in the service, manufacturing, or process steps, and any category that you need to visually see what would otherwise be a concept or verbal acknowledgement of a problem.

Learn more about these tools through one of our Six Sigma training classes! For more information on our Six Sigma training courses or services, visit 6sigma.com.

The post Six Sigma Information That Bears Repeating appeared first on 6sigma.

]]>
https://6sigma.com/six-sigma-information-bears-repeating/feed/ 0
Tools and Terms of Your Lean Six Sigma Toolbox https://6sigma.com/tools-terms-lean-six-sigma-toolbox/ https://6sigma.com/tools-terms-lean-six-sigma-toolbox/#respond Mon, 26 Feb 2018 23:26:00 +0000 https://6sigma.com/?p=21900 Lean Six Sigma tools for problem solving can be used by anyone, since they are pretty straightforward. Provided you know what the issue is, there is a Lean Six Sigma tool that can help.

lean six sigma toolbox Tools and Terms of Your Lean Six Sigma Toolbox appeared first on 6sigma.

]]>
Lean Six Sigma tools for problem solving can be used by anyone, since they are pretty straightforward. Provided you know what the issue is, there is a Lean Six Sigma tool that can help.

lean six sigma toolbox

So we are going to go down a few of these Lean Six Sigma tools and terms and what they are used for. Remember these are just some examples; how these tools can be used is only limited by your creativity.

Tools and Terms of Lean Six Sigma

  1. Cause and Effect Diagram: this tool is a great tool for visually seeing the relationships between multiple causes and the effects they produce.
  2. Fishbone Diagram: this diagram resembles a fish and can be used as a cause and effect diagram. The spine represents the effect and the branches can represent various causes.
  3. The 5 Whys: this is an excellent tool where you keep asking why as you get deeper until you get to the root cause of the problem. This way you can implement the proper countermeasures to fix the issue.
  4. Kaizen: an honorary lean tool that was adopted into Lean Six Sigma. It is a Japanese word meaning “change for the better” and it is used for continuous small improvements, involving all staff members.
  5. Value Stream Analysis: this is an analytical tool that monitors all activities done and is depicted visually in a Value Stream Map. Here you can see what activities don’t add value and which ones are necessary, meaning they add value to the product or service.
  6. Root Cause: this is the ultimate cause of the problem/issue.
  7. PDCA Cycle (Plan-Do-Check-Act): this is a 4-step plan used to solve issues in quality control. It is also known as the Deming Cycle, Shewhart Cycle or Deming Wheel.

This is just a partial list. Interested in learning more about these tools and terms? Why not enroll in one of our Six Sigma training classes? For more information on our courses or services, please visit 6sigma.com.

SaveSave

The post Tools and Terms of Your Lean Six Sigma Toolbox appeared first on 6sigma.

]]>
https://6sigma.com/tools-terms-lean-six-sigma-toolbox/feed/ 0
Differences Between FMEA and the Cause and Effect Diagram https://6sigma.com/differences-between-fmea-and-cause-and-effect-diagram/ https://6sigma.com/differences-between-fmea-and-cause-and-effect-diagram/#respond Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:00:56 +0000 https://opexlearning.com/resources/?p=24573

FMEA and cause and effect diagrams (also known as fishbone diagrams) are two commonly used analytical tools in the context of Six Sigma. However, some less experienced leaders often tend to confuse the two and may even use them interchangeably in conversation, despite them being […]

The post Differences Between FMEA and the Cause and Effect Diagram appeared first on 6sigma.

]]>

FMEA and cause and effect diagrams (also known as fishbone diagrams) are two commonly used analytical tools in the context of Six Sigma. However, some less experienced leaders often tend to confuse the two and may even use them interchangeably in conversation, despite them being quite different in fundamental application and purpose.

Understanding how the two differ from each other, and what the appropriate use for each is, can make a huge difference in how you approach the analysis of problems occurring in your daily operations. It can also help you spot some common mistakes in the workflow of your team (for example, when you notice someone using the wrong type of tool to analyze a certain situation).

What They Have in Common

Before we dig into the differences between the two tools, it can be useful to get a good idea of why people confuse them in the first place, and what the similarities between them are. The common points are mostly related to the core purpose of the two methodologies that is, what they’re used for and what kind of assistance they can offer you in your analysis of regularly occurring problems.

They are both designed to help you pinpoint exactly what went wrong in a problematic situation, and what factors contributed to the failure that occurred in the end. However, FMEA breaks down the problem into abstract components related to the operational structure of the organization, while cause and effect diagrams tend to be more focused on more substantial concepts, such as specific materials, procedures and so on.

Specific Differences

As we mentioned above, the cause and effect diagram is more closely concerned with how specific components of your organization have contributed to the failure. In addition, it shows a directed graph, with the failure being at the very right, and the distance between it and different components used to indicate how closely they are related to the failure itself. Something at the very end of the graph likely contributed very little to the problem, although its contribution is still non-negligible if it’s on the chart.

In contrast, FMEA groups contributing factors according to which part of the production process they occurred in is it a functional issue, a problem with the fundamental design, with the way the process is carried out, etc. There is some visual grouping in FMEA as well, but it serves a different purpose than in fishbone diagrams. The grouping here is more of a logical tool used to determine the closeness of certain components in a functional sense.

It’s also worth pointing out that cause and effect diagrams tend to look more closely at the root cause of the issue, whereas FMEA is concerned with improving the overall process in a sustainable way which leads to a reduction of flaws in the long run. That’s not to say that FMEA does not deal with root causes in any way but it tends to help you discover them more organically, leading you to the solution by aiding your intuition as it helps you see the big picture.

And to answer the big question that some people inevitably ask in these situations — there is no better tool between the two. Asking which the better one is would be a bit like asking a carpenter if the saw or hammer is the better tool. They both have their own applications in specific situations, and an experienced leader has to learn to realize the appropriate use for both, and know when to apply them.

Conclusion

There are many different tools that can help you gain a better understanding of how certain failures manifest themselves in your organization. Exploring this area and learning when each of those techniques is useful is one of the most important factors for a serious leader, and it’s something you should do as early as possible when implementing Six Sigma in your organization. Understanding what leads to the development of a specific issue is key to ensuring that your company as a whole will run in a sustainable way in the future.

 

The post Differences Between FMEA and the Cause and Effect Diagram appeared first on 6sigma.

]]>
https://6sigma.com/differences-between-fmea-and-cause-and-effect-diagram/feed/ 0
Glossary of Six Sigma Terms: Letters A – C https://6sigma.com/six-sigma-glossary-c/ https://6sigma.com/six-sigma-glossary-c/#respond Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:32:47 +0000 https://6sigma.com/?p=20984 A
  • Acceptable Quality Level.

    The term acceptable quality level, abbreviated as AQL, is a concept appearing in Six Sigma sampling inspection. The concept describes the maximum percentage of defects that is acceptable for a long-term average. Six Sigma practitioners use AQL to put a cap on allowable defect when inspecting a batch […]

    The post Glossary of Six Sigma Terms: Letters A – C appeared first on 6sigma.

    ]]> A
    • Acceptable Quality Level.

      The term acceptable quality level, abbreviated as AQL, is a concept appearing in Six Sigma sampling inspection. The concept describes the maximum percentage of defects that is acceptable for a long-term average. Six Sigma practitioners use AQL to put a cap on allowable defect when inspecting a batch of items. As per the basics of sampling inspection, the batch is either then accepted or rejected based on its suitability.

     

    • Accuracy. 

      When we talk about accuracy, it is usually as a term of measurement. Accuracy describes the difference in average or means of numerical readings, as well as the true / target value. It is essentially the same as bias when used for measurement. The difference between observed measurements and the true value, based on the reference standard. Any Six Sigma practitioner or statistician will use accuracy to discover data biases. In process variation, practitioners aim to create accuracy by adjusting the process mean.

     

    • Activity Network Diagrams.

      ANDs or activity network diagrams display information about Six Sigma activities and how they are interdependent. ANDs are only ever used in complex projects to help with planning, scheduling, and identifying critical pathways. Critical pathways are activities that would suffer from delay, ultimately impacting project completion. The most commonly used activity network diagram is a project evaluation and review technique, or PERT. In PERT, nodes or circles represent milestones in a project, interlinked by numbered lines to show duration.

     

    • Analysis of Variance.

      Also known as ANOVA, analysis of variance is a statistical technique used by Six Sigma project leaders. You can use ANOVA to compare whether samples are taken from populations with the same mean, or if their population means possess significant differences. ANOVA analyzes variation in data sets to deduce how much variation has contributed to each factor. You should use a hypothesis test to work out how much variation is statistically significant per each source. Once you have proven or disproven your hypothesis, you can use ANOVA, provided each process conforms to normal distribution.

     

    • Analytical Statistics.

      Six Sigma Belts use analytical statistics, sometimes known as inferential statistics, to draw conclusions about populations based on their sample data. For instance, three sets data values, at 4, 8, and 9, might refer to the number of years three homeowners have owned their homes. You would use analytical statistics to make inferences about the mean amount of time your sample participants have owned their homes, which would be 7 Using such a small sample would be impractical, which is why a full-scale study involving a sufficient sample size is necessary. During your study, you would use analytical statistics to ensure your sample is representative of the population.

     

    B

    • Balanced Scorecard.

      Six Sigma project leaders use the balanced scorecard strategy to increase performance and accountability when both are lacking. Using balance scorecard, you can develop performance measures based on four categories. Financial, the most common focus for performance. Customer, based on the known needs and potential expectations for future demand. Business processes, how efficient your operations are. Learning and growth, how you cultivate knowledge and expertise in your employees. The balance scorecard system states that practitioners place too much importance on financial measures. As such, short-term focus on the bottom line of expense operations is more critical to success in the long-term.

     

    • Bayes Theorem.

      Bayes Theorem is an important concept in probability theory. It is a statistical method to calculate conditional probabilities. This means that the likelihood of an event occurring is dependent on how probable the event is, along with the accuracy of your measuring instrument. Six Sigma Belts use it in quality improvement projects to probe probabilities. You can also use it in manufacturing environments to detect the probability of errors. When using Bayes Theorem, your probabilities are the probability of a positive result, the prior probability of the problem, the probability of a positive result with the problem and without it, plus the probability of the problem with a good result.

     

    • Benchmarking. 

      Benchmarking can be used by any Six Sigma practitioner to strategically improve systems by comparing your current system to an equivalent one. You may wish to compare the system used by a competitor, a company from another industry, or between divisions in your organization. Benchmarking improves critical systems that are not the primary focus of the company. For example, a manufacturing industry may wish to use benchmarking to enhance its distribution system.

     

    • Box and Whisker Plots.

      Six Sigma practitioners use box and whisker plots to display small data sets, depending on their relevance to the project. You can create a box and whisker plot by plotting your first and third quartile onto a graph, with each quartile represented by the width sides of a rectangle. The length sides represent your interquartile range, while a vertical line through the middle represents your median. The whiskers are horizontal lines that extend to the largest and smallest data values, but only those that are not outliers. Your outliers are plotted using an asterisk. Outliers are usually more than 1.5 times the interquartile range above your third quartile, but below the first. You can use box and whisker plots in process improvement projects.

     

    C

    • Calibration Standard.

      Your calibration standard should be used in measurement systems to calibrate your measuring devices for Six Sigma projects. Calibration standard refers to a point of known accuracy that you can trace according to the national standard. In the US, the National Institute of Standards and Technology provides the standard on which to base your work.

     

    • Cause and Effect Diagram.

      The Cause and Effect diagram is also known as an Ishikawa diagram or a fishbone diagram. Six Sigma Belts use it to represent and categorize information about a problem. The diagram resembles a fish skeleton, with a central line (the spine) representing a problem, usually a production issue. Additional lines branch off the problem line, creating categories for methods, personnel, materials, and equipment. Each additional line then branches off to narrow down the potential causes. You use Cause and Effect diagrams in process improvement and root cause analysis to determine the source of an issue. Once you have found the cause, you can correct the issue and put preventative measures into place.

     

    • Central Limit Theorem.

      Six Sigma project leaders use CLT, or central limit theorem,  in statistical process control. CLT relies on how well data conforms to normal distribution, stating how even if a process is non-conforming, the sample means taken will still be normal. In other words, the larger the sample you work with, the greater the tendency for conformity. You use CLT by taking many samples and calculating the means of each one. When represented in a graph, the data should display a different shape for each population formed by each sample mean.

     

     

     

    The post Glossary of Six Sigma Terms: Letters A – C appeared first on 6sigma.

    ]]>
    https://6sigma.com/six-sigma-glossary-c/feed/ 0